More new doodles. (Not Safe for Work)

[elemer]

Okay these are not work safe, keep that in mind.

http://www.comicsindependent.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=36&pos=5

http://www.comicsindependent.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=36&pos=6

http://www.comicsindependent.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=36&pos=7

http://www.comicsindependent.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=36&pos=8

http://www.comicsindependent.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=36&pos=9

http://www.comicsindependent.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=36&pos=10

http://www.comicsindependent.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=36&pos=11

http://www.comicsindependent.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=37&pos=0


Have a good weekend all.

[Electromancer]

Dude, MARK YOUR WORK! This is the second time i had to quickly close the window. I have no problem with the pictures, but it really sucks when someone walks in as you open up one of these. To the untrained eye, it is nothing but porn.

Not meant as an insult, you just really need to add the proper tags to your work. I think it is NSFW, aka Not Safe For Work. And i do realize you have that in the thread, it helps to have it in the title as well though so those of us that go straight for the links aren't shocked when we see the pictures.

[maddexx]

if it says that its not work safe then read it bro, first thing I saw was that. dont go clicking links without readin the first thing said :p


edit: and no, his stuff isnt porn

[Ciarin]

haha, he's mad because you didn't say not safe for work loud enough for him to notice!

LOL

Good graphics by the way. Very sexy. My only criticism is that the girl doesn't have much expression in her face. It looks like a mannequin.

[Woody]

I put an NSF disclaimer in the title. Hopefully that one will be "loud" enough.

[Evil_Gondi]

Good stuff, though like Ciarin said, could use some expression.

[Electromancer]

The only part I normally bother to read for these is the thread name. If that seems like an idiotic thing to do, your right it probably is. Especially when I know that this guy has a lot of work that is NSFW.

And to whoever said this stuff isn't porn, your right. I never said it was porn either, read my comment again.

[Darth Lorax]

The funny thing is, I opened these links because it said NSFW. That was after Woody added the disclaimer though.

Anyway, great stuff!

[boghira]

Are you using Poser? Seems like the stiff and emotionless model face is one of the drawbacks of the software and I never really was a fan of it, great textures though, the first one is amazing lacework.

[elemer]

Are you using Poser? Seems like the stiff and emotionless model face is one of the drawbacks of the software and I never really was a fan of it, great textures though, the first one is amazing lacework.

Poser is one of about 7 programs I'm currently getting a feel for.

As for the face, really that has nothing to do with the modeling software or the render engine used. It's a question of if any attempt was made to create an emotional impact to the image. In the case of the images above, I was more interested in testing the speed with which I could produce new scenes re-using the same model, textures, and lighting effects. Think of it a a proof of concept test set. Similar to what you might do with a new camera and studio lighting set as a photographer.

[Torzak]

http://www.comicsindependent.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=36&pos=8

looks kinda wierd... an arm through the leg?
general flaw on more of them, might want to work on the pose yourself, since the premade poses of poser sux ass